Urban Core Gun Violence: It’s Complicated

Urban core gun violence

Inner City Pressure (Photo credit: shannonpatrick17)

Hey, I’m all for sensible gun control measures, better gun education, better data collection, etc. But the methods that are currently (February 2013) being considered in Congress are not going to work in inner city situations. There are different cultural issues and economic issues going on in these areas.

First, there is a culture of toughness that is vitally important, and very difficult to break down, among those who are a part of it. ‘Backing down’ makes a person a ‘pussy’, calling the police makes you a ‘snitch’, and there is real truth in the belief that you have to take care of yourself because the law is not on your side. 

Second, many (most?) guns in the inner city have been ‘extra-legal’ for most of their lifetimes, bought and sold and passed around so many times that no one really knows who originally owned the gun – and that’s if the serial number hasn’t been filed off.

Third, there is a good amount of evidence that most inner city violence can be traced back to small groups of ‘super offenders’ who are extremely difficult to get to either through law enforcement or through advocacy groups.

urban core gun violence

Source of firearms possessed by Federal inmates, 1997 “Federal Firearm Offenders, 1992-98″. Bureau of Justice Statistics . . (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Banning ‘assault rifles’ (the quotes indicate I know the term is debatable and don’t want to have that debate right now) isn’t going to change much in the inner city because 1) most of the guns are extra-legal, and 2) most of the guns are handguns.

Background checks aren’t going to change much in the inner city because 1) have I mentioned that most of the guns are extra-legal? And 2) most professional criminals can find and pay someone to buy a gun legally for them if they need them.

Mental health improvements may somewhat benefit people in the inner city but 1) there are significant cultural barriers to access, not least of which is that most mental health professionals look like me (white, middle class) and not like them (brown or black, working and poverty class) 2) there are significant barriers to benefits from mental health when they are not accompanied by reasonable measures to ensure paths out of generational poverty and despair that don’t involve extra-legal activities.

So, except for improving data collection about gun violence, which will benefit people in the inner city (more knowledge benefits everyone) we have pretty much bupkis that will help those who are among the most likely to be affected by gun violence.

A note here. I am not arguing that the proposed measures would not benefit the US as a whole. I completely support the proposals being made and can see how they would benefit most of us, even including many of the people in the urban cores – but they aren’t going to be enough.

So what can we do? Aw hell. If I had all the answers, I’d be talking to Congress instead of you all. Instead, I’m going to pose a few questions. Let me know what you think. (And keep it respectful and evidence based, or at least rational).

Questions to ask about Solving the Urban Core Gun Violence Issue:

How would ‘bullet control‘ work? Could we have an exception for bullets used at shooting ranges sold by and for the range and collected and measured for proof they’re not ‘escaping’?

What might an effective advocacy group for the urban core gun violence issue look like? Are there any out there that are doing a fabulous job and making a difference?

Is prison outreach any part of the solution? How could it be done?

Is there room in this discussion for a re-opening of the topic of entitlements, especially including education entitlements that give youth an alternative to violence as a way to make a living?

We’ve talked about mental health, but we haven’t talked about substance abuse in the gun violence debate, and there’s a much stronger link between active substance abuse and perpetration of gun violence than mental health and perpetration of gun violence. What’s the next step?

Who is with me on addressing the ‘Isms that are contributing to the issues – racism, sexism, classism – am I missing any? How should the be addressed? By whom?

Are there traditionally conservative ideas that could be used to address urban core gun violence? What are they? How could they benefit?

Some fascinating studies have shown that there is a *huge* correlation between reducing concentrations of lead in the environment and a reduction of all crimes in the US over the last twenty years. Are there pockets of our urban core where there are still homes with a lot of lead paint? What could be done?

How do we address the ‘secondary market‘ such as gun shows? How will it impact the urban core?

Is there any role for decriminalization of drugs in this equation? Where does that come in?

Do you have any more ideas that aren’t covered here? What are they? How could they help?

This isn’t a ‘today’s dance’, but the same rules apply. Be respectful, thoughtful, and contribute to the conversation. Share often and early to bring new points of view in through those handy buttons at the bottom of the post. If you just want to think about these things and ‘lurk’, you don’t have to say a word.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta


Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponPin on PinterestShare on TumblrTweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit

About odanu

Maureen O'Danu is the webmistress of Am I the Only One Dancing? where there is a new discussion every day on any one of dozens of topics and ideas, as well as reviews, geekery, family, fun, and enough politics to season the pot.
Bookmark the permalink.

4 Comments

  1. Administrivia point: you are cross-posting to Live Journal and to Dreamwidth. Dreamwidth is further crossposting to Live Journal. As such, I am seeing duplicate posts on my LJ Friends List. The further duplication on my RSS feed is expected and not a problem (as would the duplication on my Dreamwidth Subscriptions page, if I actually looked at it).

    “Bullet Control” seems to me to be a bit of a non-starter unless you also eliminate hand-loading, reloading, and backyard shooting ranges. When I’ve visited my family in Colorado and went to the range, we shot hundreds of rounds of hand reloads that we brought with us, policed the brass, and reloaded them at home. The much more expensive commercial rounds that they had for personal defense were rarely used for practice.

    I think drug decriminalization would cause a drop in inner-city violence in much the same way as the end of prohibition did in the 1930′s. Of course, it would have other effects in inner-cities that are hard to predict (are drugs and their effects a net income or expense for inner-cities?).

    • Thanks for the heads up. I’ll fix.it when I get home & respond more on the points

    • Let me know if you see double posts after today. I fixed it (I think) this morning.

      The reloader argument is a valid one, and I’m glad you brought it up. Does it apply equally to all weapons, or are some harder than others to reload?

      Drug decriminalization would almost certainly reduce inner city violence. Coupled with effective mental health (including substance abuse) treatment and prevention measures, it could transform the argument.

  2. I saw this in the LJ repost of your daily tweets, and noticed I never replied.

    Virtually all ammo you are likely to see in handguns or rifles is made in one of two forms: rim fire and center fire. Rim fire ammo cannot be reloaded: the case is manufactured with a crush-sensitive explosive in the rim which is set off when fired. This primer charge sets off the gunpower, which fires the bullet.

    Center fire ammo is basically made from 4 parts: the bullet, the case, the powder, and the primer cup. To reload a fired round, you (a) remove the spent primer, (b) resize the brass (which was distorted in firing), (c) press on a new primer cup, (d) add a measured amount of powder, and (e) press in a new bullet. It’s an easy process, especially if you have proper tooling — tooling which is cheap, and could be made by any competent machinist. A complicated machine, capable of doing all the steps simultaneously for several rounds and creating a new round for each pull of the handle, costs $400 new with all the dies for 9mm pistol rounds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>