Meme Sauce: Obama’s Daughters Under Guard at School


meme sauce takes pictorial memes from around the internet and digs a bit deeper

You’ve seen the graphic passed around Facebook and Twitter and Digg and Reddit, and every even vaguely NRA affiliated website on the web. Obama's Daughters Under Guard at School

That hypocrite! He’s trying to take our guns, and his own daughters go to school with armed guards. You outraged yet?

Don’t be.  First, President Obama does not want your guns. He does want better regulation for more responsible gun ownership, but that’s a whole different kettle of fish.  Gun control did not even hit his agenda until after the Sandy Hook incident, despite many progressives urging him to act since the day he took office.

So if you’re a responsible gun owner who uses your guns lawfully, stop fretting. He’s not pointing any fingers at you.

Second, Obama’s daughters going to school with armed guards is a whole different kettle of fish than your daughters (or my sons) going to school with armed guards. 

  • Do your kids get 24 hour Secret Service protection details for life?
  • Are there several dozen threats against yours and your family’s lives on a daily basis, some of which are credible?
  • If someone were to kidnap or kill your children at their school, would it conceivably create a significant international incident or endanger national security?
Apples and oranges

Apples and oranges (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

No? Then your situation is not the same as the President’s, you are comparing apples to oranges, and you’re making a mountain out of a molehill.

(And if the answer is yes, then you are in a pretty rarefied group that can’t be generalized to the average US citizen, so again, apples and oranges)

By the way (and this is just my curiosity speaking) why do the same people who have repeatedly and loudly protested for some decades now that we are becoming a police state where individuals have no freedoms suddenly want police in every public school in America?

Isn’t that the same police state you keep saying you’re against? And if not, why is it different?

Given the choice, would you rather that there be completely unregulated private ownership of guns and with it, mandated armed police officers in schools, churches, theaters, hospitals, community health centers, and other areas where mass shootings could occur, or would you rather have sensible limits on who can own guns and what guns can be owned? Why?

Are you completely comfortable with the idea that a state who has an armed officer keeping your children under guard at school could and would not use that power for illegitimate purposes? Why or why not?

Also, would you agree with the statement ‘with every right comes an equal and opposite responsibility’? Why or why not?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta


Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on StumbleUponPin on PinterestShare on TumblrTweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit

About Maureen O'Danu

Maureen O'Danu is the webmistress of Am I the Only One Dancing? where there is a new discussion every day on any one of dozens of topics and ideas, as well as reviews, geekery, family, fun, and enough politics to season the pot.
Bookmark the permalink.

One Comment

  1. Actually, a lot of the people circulating the meme that I’ve seen don’t want police added to the school; they want the teachers to be allowed to carry so that there will always be armed people available to deal with any shooter. The point isn’t that his daughters are surrounded by police per se, it’s the fact that they have weapons to defend themselves with (in this case in the hands of highly trained and dedicated defenders) and the regulations they see being pushed are removing that option from their own kids and the teachers who are supposed to protect them.

    Me, I’m in favor of a gun license similar to a driver’s license — something that shows you know how to operate a gun safely and responsibly, and gives you a right to carry one. I’m not in favor of anything which REGISTERS the specific weapons, because that IS the kind of thing that gives an oppressive government leverage. I think that the license should probably come in different grades (small arms, automatic military small arms, etc.) but other than that provide the government with no knowledge at all of who has how many weapons.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eleven + 18 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield